|
I would agree with this type of governing
body. One that sets standards like
RDNS entries and what they mean. < pessimistic rant> But it is still up to each mail admin(s)
to implement an anti-spam policy. And
the history of governing bodies is such that only the biggest players have a
voice. This would probably mean
that AOL, Earthlink, RR, Hotmail, etc would be on the governing council…and
it would be interpreted to their greatest competitive advantage…and
nothing would have changed! </pessimistic rant>
-----Original Message----- This is exactly why I think we should have a some sort of
global internet council for setting standards, rather than all of us little
guys having to react, after the fact, whenever a large player makes a
change. The global council could maintain a distribution list to help
mail admins to keep up with proposed changes and implementation
schedules. This is very similar to any other industry that must keep up
with compliance standards. In some ways this also seems like an unfair competition
tactic as it makes the little guys look bad when our customers can't
send mail to AOL...it encourages customers to move to the large players to
avoid not having mail delivered to their users.
----- Original Message ----- From: Todd Holt Sent: Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
AOL and Reverse DNS I know this will stir a few people the
wrong way, but… If so many people are upset that MS is
being monopolistic by using their EULA to prevent software from operating, then
why don’t those same people get upset at AOL for the internet-nazi-police
tactics used to prevent mail from being delivered? MS just says that you can’t use
certain apps on their OS. AOL says
that you can’t deliver mail through mail servers (that control more email
than any other on the planet) because they deemed it “bad” through
inaccurate, generalized and dare I say “monopolistic” policies. The lack of complaints about AOL just
shows that the MS bashers are not upset about the MS policies (or monopoly),
they just want to complain about the big company on the block. I think if the majority owner of AOL was
the richest person on the planet, they would bash AOL. How short sided!!! Further, all of the justice dept.
proceedings are based on complaints by the competition, not the users. On the other hand, AOL has thousands of
consumer complaints, but very few (if any) complaints by competitors. It’s obvious that the justice
dept. just wants to appease whiny losers like Jim Barksdale and Scott
McNealy. And the MS bashers just
fall in line. Lemmings. Todd Holt -----Original Message----- Hi, I just noticed that AOL has stepped up their policies
another notch. They used to say that "AOL **MAY**" not
accept email from servers without Reverse DNS. In the last two weeks, that changed:
Best Regards |
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Todd Holt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Hosting Support
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Todd Holt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse... Pete McNeil
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Re... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL an... Pete McNeil
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Re... Burzin Sumariwalla
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS DLAnalyzer Support
