Andrew,
Thursday, November 21, 2002 you wrote:
CA> I want to keep my SPAMCOP HOLD action (and a few others). I've
CA> established with our team that going to a pure weighted system is
CA> probably in our future.
I have a rule that fires from a custom external filter program
that uses routeto and I have a weighting system. I got around the
weighting conflict because Scott suggested using a negative weight
on the external filter results which then forces the rotueto. It
is working wonderfully.
CA> WHITELIST FROM hotmail.com WHEN REVDNS ENDSWITH hotmail.com
CA> OTOH, Scott's been keeping mum about the future of filtering; I
CA> suspect that my suggestions could be "user driven" if he
CA> implements regular expressions (hint, hint).
You can write your own external program and then you do things
like that. I've done this and it works really well. Right now our
external program only has one rule in it but we could easily add
others.
Another option that will be soon available is SNIFFER which will
have user defined filtering rules. I don't know exactly how they
will be managed but if flexible enough then we'll abandon ours.
I'm doubtful declude will include a full regex engine but even if
I think I'd certainly expect to pay a pretty good fee for it.
Terry Fritts
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
