Kami,

Is your DNS that IMAIL/Declude uses local to you?  Or are you using an
upstream DNS?  That many IPV4 tests may warrant this.  We noticed a large
performance boost by using a DNS on the local LAN.....


Just a thought....


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes & Server Load


I truly wish I could explain it..

May be I am dreaming.. But what I see is Declude does not get to 100% CPU
since we moved it to IMail to do IP4r.

This morning for example I saw about 10 or so Declude processes.. One at
19%.. A lot at 0% and then jumping to 10% and going away some hit 100% for 1
second and disappeared.

Before we were seeing 100% CPU staying for several seconds and then each one
of the waiting processes hitting 100%.  We could not even more the mouse..
It would move in steps.. Now we don't have that problem.

Watching this is now my favorite pass time... A cup of coffee and watching
CPU & Declude processes..

Have to try it with beer.. Could be more fun.. But can't imagine anything be
more fun!

:)

Regards,
Kami

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes & Server Load


Kami,

I'm running ten IP4r tests, referred to in my original email as an "external
DB query."  There seems to be a descrepency between this as a cause and
Scott's answer:

   >   the Declude process should not show high CPU usage in this case.
   >   Declude uses the "Sleep()" command, which gives up CPU cycles to
   >   other  programs (and will prevent the Task Manager from showing CPU
   >   usage in  Declude during idle times, such as when Declude JunkMail is
   >   waiting for an  external or DNS-based test to complete).

Assuming we're all talking about the same thing, Declude continues to run as
a process waiting for replies from IP4r requests but does not consume much
CPU time while doing so.  Does pulling out IP4r tests during an episode show
a immidiate decline in CPU use?

Does anyone know how the people hosting the IP4r tests feel about us
slamming them with queries?  Suppose I'm cruising along with 20,000 queries
a day, then jump to 500,000 over a few weeks, surely that makes an
impression somewhere?  Is there a point were we should ask about doing more?

Thanks
Dan



On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:33, Kami Razvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi Dan:
>
>We had a similar problem.  I posted a couple of messages regarding this
>very issue.  We were having CPU at 100% for minutes.. & in one case
>when a mail list hit our server with a lot of users receiving the
>message at the same time the CPU was at 100% for almost an hour.  We
>could not do anything... Finally the Declude processes disappeared and
>all was back to normal again.
>
>What I noticed was the cause more than anything else was the IP4r
>tests. Declude appears to be fast in filtering and everything that it
>does.  The IP4r tests are a different story and naturally out of
>Declude hands.  We had a lot of them and by taking them off it brought
>things to normal.
>
>I stated this in an earlier posting- we are not doing all of our IP4r
>tests in IMail version 8.  It works much faster and since it caches it
>seems like it works great.  We have about 60 IP4r tests (majority of
>what is listed in Declude/junkmail/manual.htm site.  We will take some
>off and add others as we find their effectiveness but for now we are
>using a lot of them and no problem.
>
>I am interested to see if this helps you if you try it.
>
>Regards,
>Kami
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode
>Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes & Server Load
>
>
>We added about 350 users to our 2000+ user dual server configuration in
>the last week and were doing pretty well until this afternoon.
>Suddenly the CPU load graph stopped looking like its normal Donky Kong
>video game simulation (up and down) and more resembled a 100% highway
>with a few dips.  Declude processes were taking quite a while to clear
>before finishing, to be replaced by another.  I pulled out some multi
>thousand line tests and it nary made a dent.
>
>Just before bringing our 3rd server into the fold, things quieted down.
>While I've already ordered 2 new dual processor 1U's, I want to par
>down (if not eliminate) the variables invovled:
>
>1) If an external DB query slowed things down, delaying each Declude
>process, would Declude still show high CPU consumption while waiting
>and would the graph still be pegged?  If not, is there any situation
>external to my server that would?
>
>2) Is it possible for Declude to be consuming CPU cycles while idling
>for some other reason?
>
>3) If something else is running in the background, eating cyles, does
>Declude 'look' like its working harder?
>
>4) If a user (or users) all received masses of attached files (say
>multi megabyte), would this slow things down in the way described?
>
>5) When a new client reports having 30 users, whats the best way to
>decipher if this is the case?  Is there a log analyzer that inventories
>unique addresses (understanding that 1 user can have many addresses).
>
>
>Thanks!
>Dan
>
>---
>[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
>(http://www.declude.com)]
>
>---
>This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
>unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
>"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
>http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>---
>[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
>(http://www.declude.com)]
>
>---
>This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
>unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
>"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
>http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to