>> The problem here is that instead of having a test with 2 results (pass/fail), you've got a test with 3 results (pass/fail/na). That would require a major change to the Declude architecture to handle. <<
But it would make sense <G>.
Would it?
The only tests I can think of that can have more than 2 different outcomes would be set up as multiple tests.
In the meantime, couldn't he define the test TWICE, once assigning a positive weight for failure and one with a negative weight for non-failure?
Not the way I am looking at it. This would have the same effect as having the test defined once, with both a weight for failure and a negative weight for non-failure.
What he is talking about is something like having the SPAMDOMAINS test being split into 2 tests, one that says "For E-mail with a return address of yahoo.com or hotmail.com, the E-mail should fail TEST1 if the reverse DNS entry doesn't have yahoo.com or hotmail.com in it", and another that says "All E-mail should fail TEST2 unless it comes from yahoo.com or hotmail.com".
I think it might be possible to do this with a filter, but this gets very confusing.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
