Good Idea Bill.

Kevin Bilbee


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
>
>
> Would it make sense to start building beta documentation at the same time
> you release beta code, and create a beta testers web site with the beta
> documentation.  That way people can provide feed-back on the documentation
> as well as the code prior to release.  Then, once the beta code
> is ready to
> be released, your supporting documentation is ready to be placed in the
> manual, as well.
>
> Just a thought...
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
>
>
> >
> > > > I understand but there are far too many changes between releases and
> > > > many interim releases between betas. Beta is usually a set
> of features
> > > > and fixes and then a release. With Declude there are new
> features with
> > > > every beta. Freeze something and release it.
> >
> > >I have to agree with David
> >
> > FWIW, the reason we use this unusual beta cycle (where each
> beta normally
> > both adds new features and fixes bugs, rather than having an
> initial beta
> > with tons of new features and subsequent betas just fixing bugs) is
> because
> > we're able to get more features in the product more quickly this way.
> >
> > With a more traditional beta cycle, you might see a new release followed
> by
> > a beta with new features 4 months later, followed by 2 months of
> bug-fixing
> > betas.  That means waiting 4 months for new features (and fixes, unless
> > patches are created for older versions, which gets tricky), and then a
> > 2-month code freeze.  With our system, though, there are times
> that we've
> > added a new feature within hours of it being requested, and have an
> interim
> > release ready for people to use.
> >
> > Our system does have its drawbacks, however, as several people have
> pointed
> > out (the main one being "information overload" -- lots of new features,
> but
> > no one easily accessible location for information on them).
> >
> >                                                     -Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
> > Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
> > vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to