Scott... 

Let me do a simple test.. Just in case it works..

Could I have a million dollars?

Regards,
Kami


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering
functionality


>As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly 
>come across some limitations which restrict what can be done 
>effectively, difficulty in figuring the scoring of some variable 
>filters, and challenges from the additional processing power required 
>to counterbalance some filters, so I just wanted to request three 
>different things which appear like they might be somewhat reasonable 
>extensions to the current environment.  I'm putting these all together 
>in one message because, at least from my perspective, they are all 
>related, and I didn't want to bother you repeatedly with such requests.
Those requests are as follows:

Thanks for the suggestions.  Giving the number of people that are now using
filters in Declude JunkMail, and the size of them, it's about time for us to
expand them a bit.

>    LOG:   11/13/2003 20:43:02 Q331903a90080bcc8 Msg failed IPLINKED 
> ([Score: 7] Message failed IPLINKED test (189)). Action=WARN.
>    WARN:   X-RBL-Warning: IPLINKED: [Score: 7] Message failed IPLINKED 
> test (226)

These two will be changed to use "Message failed IPLINKED test (line 189,
weight 7)".

>    TESTSFAILED:   X-Weight: 16 (REVDNS [0], IPNOTINMX [0], IPLINKED [7], 
> SPAMCOP [9])

This can be done in the next release with a new %TESTSFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS%
variable.

>2) Provide a method of defeating a custom filter (zero points) based on 
>failing a specially marked test.

This will be in the next release.  "END" instead of the weight will force
the test to end.

>3) Provide a method of defining a maximum and/or minimum number of 
>points that a particular custom filter can score.

A MAXWEIGHT option will be in the next release, that will allow you to
define the maximum weight that the test can add.  If the maximum weight is
reached, processing will stop (so any negative weights would need to go at
the beginning of the test), and the maximum weight will be used instead of
the actual weight (IE if you have "MAXWEIGHT 60", and the filter is at 55
points with a line that would add 10 points, processing would stop with a
weight of 60, not 65).

                                                    -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to