THANK YOU Scott! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. > Scott Perry > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional > filtering functionality > > > > >As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have > repeatedly > >come across some limitations which restrict what can be done > effectively, > >difficulty in figuring the scoring of some variable filters, and > >challenges from the additional processing power required to > counterbalance > >some filters, so I just wanted to request three different > things which > >appear like they might be somewhat reasonable extensions to > the current > >environment. I'm putting these all together in one message > because, at > >least from my perspective, they are all related, and I > didn't want to > >bother you repeatedly with such requests. Those requests > are as follows: > > Thanks for the suggestions. Giving the number of people that > are now using > filters in Declude JunkMail, and the size of them, it's about > time for us > to expand them a bit. > > > LOG: 11/13/2003 20:43:02 Q331903a90080bcc8 Msg failed IPLINKED > > ([Score: 7] Message failed IPLINKED test (189)). Action=WARN. > > WARN: X-RBL-Warning: IPLINKED: [Score: 7] Message > failed IPLINKED > > test (226) > > These two will be changed to use "Message failed IPLINKED > test (line 189, > weight 7)". > > > TESTSFAILED: X-Weight: 16 (REVDNS [0], IPNOTINMX [0], > IPLINKED [7], > > SPAMCOP [9]) > > This can be done in the next release with a new > %TESTSFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% > variable. > > >2) Provide a method of defeating a custom filter (zero > points) based on > >failing a specially marked test. > > This will be in the next release. "END" instead of the > weight will force > the test to end. > > >3) Provide a method of defining a maximum and/or minimum > number of points > >that a particular custom filter can score. > > A MAXWEIGHT option will be in the next release, that will > allow you to > define the maximum weight that the test can add. If the > maximum weight is > reached, processing will stop (so any negative weights would > need to go at > the beginning of the test), and the maximum weight will be > used instead of > the actual weight (IE if you have "MAXWEIGHT 60", and the > filter is at 55 > points with a line that would add 10 points, processing would > stop with a > weight of 60, not 65). > > -Scott > --- > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail > mailservers. > Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver > vulnerability detection. > Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day > evaluation. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
