That is what AutoWhite for Declude does. However, that does not lesson any of the problems with C/R software.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Foulks > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude > > I guess what I'm trying to say is that I like the concept.... I also > agree with all of con's that have presented. It would be nice if there > was someway we could automate the whitelist. > > What about this spin? What if Declude took the email address that the > internal user was sending to and put it in the whitelist? If it's a good > address going out then it must be good coming in, right? > > Greg > > Andy Schmidt wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >>>I think the consensus is it is not acceptable << > >>> > >>> > > > >Then let mine be the only opposing voice. > > > >I think because of Declude's weight features, Challenge/Response would be > a > >very valuable and very usable option. > > > >Any messages with LOW weight pass. This addresses your concern of > "breaking > >e-commerce". If they want to make money, they better have their mail > server > >set up appropriately. > > > >Any messages with HIGH weight, get held or deleted. I have yet to hear a > >complaint. > > > >In the middle are a small percentage of medium weights that do fail a > spam > >test or two - but are possibly legitimate. Those few messages currently > get > >a bounce message so that a false positive "victim" has a chance to > >"intervene". I have gotten zero complaints from people saying "hey, you > >spammed me with your bounce message", but every so often I do get a thank > >you from a "false positive" victim who, due to my bounce message, is able > to > >address THEIR problem. > > > >It is those bounce messages, which in the future could come with a > >"challenge/response" URL, containing the URL with the queue-ID as a > >parameter to a web application that will release their message. It's a > >shame that we currently are forced to "manually" manage the false > positives > >when Declude could automate that process! > > > >(Hm - now that I'm saying this - I should just write a little web > >application that copies the held D and Q file back to the spool and > include > >the parameterized URL in my bounce messages... If I only had the > time...) > > > >Best Regards > >Andy Schmidt > > > >H&M Systems Software, Inc. > >600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203 > >Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846 > > > >Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > >Fax: +1 201 934-9206 > > > >http://www.HM-Software.com/ > > > >--- > >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > >--- > >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > >. > > > > > > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
