|
Todd, Two things. 1) AutoWhite != AUTOWHITELIST ON 2) You don't want to have an auto-responder that handles messages that might come from forged addresses. I think the bottom line here is that although you don't mean to do this, C/R would create a problem for other administrators that are getting Joe-Jobbed by spammers. The proper method is to fine-tune your system, and if you aren't comfortable with the false positives that occur, you need to raise your fail weight and let your users deal with the issue rather than another administrator potentially. Although my system is not perfect, personal E-mail, the only thing that C/R works for, rarely FP's. FYI, Joe-Jobs have killed the nobody alias on my server, and a scan of my logs the other day showed that one domain is still getting Joe-Jobbed 3 weeks later by one of these criminals that's dictionary attacking/spamming AOL. There is almost always a Joe-Job happening on one of the 60 domains that I host, and sometimes they use real addresses, and when that happens, it can result in as many as 100 bounce messages a day to one account. I also noted last weekend that in one 24 hour period, about 6 of my customer's domains were being dictionary attacked, and in a distributed manner (Korean/Chineese servers mostly). I'm sure that they were using someone else's domains to do it as well. C/R = BOUNCE BOUNCE = BAD :( I wish this wasn't true. Matt Todd Holt wrote: Is it true that AutoWhite only works on WebMail? Could someone elaborate on the AutoWhite functionality, because I must have missed something to think would cover these C/R issues.I do like the idea of C/R only for grey area messages. This would virtually eliminate the complaints of challenging the obvious good or obvious bad messages, then reducing the number of challenge messages to something less than 5% of the messages. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude That is what AutoWhite for Declude does. However, that does not lesson any of the problems with C/R software. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Foulks Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude I guess what I'm trying to say is that I like the concept.... I also agree with all of con's that have presented. It would be nice ifthere -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- [Declude.JunkMail] Hey Scott - Here's a feature ... Greg Foulks
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hey Scott - Here's a... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Respon... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Re... Greg Foulks
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challeng... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cha... Todd Holt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMa... Sanford Whiteman
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMa... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Chall... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Re... Charles Frolick
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hey Scott - Here's a... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hey Scott - Here... Sheldon Koehler
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hey Scott - Here's a... Kami Razvan
