|
Kami, If you start mixing different tests for MAILFROM, then you run the risk of weakening the test. While this was spam, I could see a user making a mistake like this by putting information in the wrong fields. You have Web forms, just take a look at what the typical bonehead AOL user "thinks" their E-mail address is. Maybe a different test would be better, though, maybe this is just as reliable as the existing MAILFROM tests...but I doubt it. Matt Kami Razvan wrote: Hi Scott: Thanks ... A while back I was suggesting a simple test that can at least validate the format of the sender email.This is a perfect example.. This email is not valid and although it failed a lot of other tests but it should also be easy to add more weight to wrong addresses. Of course if there is an RFC addendum that says "ben."@aol.com is a valid email then my argument is totally off base. Kami -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom? -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom? Kami Razvan
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom? R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom? Kami Razvan
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom? Sanford Whiteman
- [Declude.JunkMail] Distributed Dictionary At... Matt
- [Declude.JunkMail] Distributed Dictionar... Dave Doherty
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Distributed ... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Distributed ... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Distribu... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Dist... Dave Doherty
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dist... Jason
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Dist... Matt
- [Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINM... Robert Shubert
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPNO... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPNO... Dan Geiser
