|
Makes perfect
sense to me. Everyone, including ROKSO spammers, can benefit from
implementing SPF defensively, resulting in a valid SPFPASS. And *their*
doing so dilutes the incentive for antispammers to reward those who implement
SPF defensively, which in turn dilutes SPF.
As noted in the
last 2 weeks, current wisdom is to add points to those senders that trigger a
SPFFAIL, and that rewarding a SPFPASS or SPFUNKNOWN will reveal no
joy.
Andrew
8)
|
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Frederick Samarelli
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Frederick Samarelli
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (... Kevin Bilbee
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Colbeck, Andrew
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPASS (Junk) Lyndon Eaton
