|
Please don't bounce your spam. Keep in mind that you might very well
be bouncing a majority of messages back to forged addresses. So in
effect by you lightening your load by using BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST, you
are creating problems for other administrators and that isn't very fair
to us. Matt Robert Shubert wrote: Thanks. ALERT did actually do its job, it just took a while to get the message back. And I see the new name for bounce. I'm hoping to use either action in a narrow weight range (10-14) since this is where most of my false-positives end up.Robert -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT & BOUNCE -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold vs Delete Goran Jovanovic
- [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT & BOUNCE Robert Shubert
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT & BOUNCE R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT & BOUNCE Robert Shubert
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold vs Delete Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold vs Delete Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold vs Delet... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold v... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark vs Hold... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Mark ... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMai... Darin Cox
- Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] M... Sanford Whiteman
- [Declude.JunkMail] Ignore a... Richard Farris
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Igno... R. Scott Perry
