|
Hello, All,
Over the year or so that I've been reading the
discussions on this list it seems I've read quite a bit about people scaling
their weights up, i.e. instead of having a HOLD weight of 10, you might have a
HOLD weight of 100 and then you adjust the corresponding test weights
accordingly. Assuming that what I've read is correct, for those who uses
this scaled up system...
What sort of benefit is is that you feel that you
receive from doing this? Does it allow a more granular tuning of your
weighting system? Are there any other benefits I'm not thinking of?
Does having a hold weight of 100, for example, help you think more clearly about
each test being a percentage of the overall HOLD weight?
I'm doing a major overhaul of Declude JunkMail
configuration and I figured if a scaled up weight system is the best way to do
things then I might want to implement that now.
Thanks In Advance For Your Comments!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting Syst... Dan Geiser
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting... Markus Gufler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weigh... Dan Geiser
- [Declude.JunkMail] Span Domains file Glenn Brooks
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude W... Markus Gufler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting... Todd Ryan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting... Bill
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting... Scott Fisher
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Scaling Up The Declude Weighting... Scott Fisher
