> What do you consider a wrong result????

If SPFPASS has a positive result (and so will SUBSTRACT points from the
final weight) for a SPAM message.

or

If SPFFAIL has a positive result (and so will ADD points to the final
weight) for a LEGIT message.


In absolute numbers the "wrong results" are not more then other tests has.
But this other tests has many many more "correct results" and so this tests
become usefull. SPFPASS and SPFFAIL on my system has 60% of "correct" and
40% of wrong results. Either I am missing something or this tests are
useless.


Markus





> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
> Markus Gufler
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:11 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SPF
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > No one else seeing such results with SPF?
> > 
> > Markus
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus 
> > > Gufler
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:32 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SPF
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >          SPFPASS spf     pass    x       -5      0
> > > >          SPFFAIL spf     fail    x       8       0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Last month I've created SPF TXT records for some domains 
> on our DNS.
> > > Some days ago I've added this two tests and now I can see 
> not realy 
> > > good results.
> > > 
> > > Based on 9914 processed messages from yesterday
> > > 
> > > SPFFAIL has had 38 correct results and 105 wrong results.
> > > SPFPASS has had 234 correct results and 80 wrong results.
> > > 
> > > So only 4% of all processed messages has had ANY result. 
> From this 
> > > results 60 was correct and 40% wrong.
> > > 
> > > Am I missing something? 
> > > I know that not many domains has already SPF TXT records but 
> > > introducing such a technology should produce bether results, or?
> > > 
> > > Markus
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
> > > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
> and type 
> > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at 
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to