Outsource it to my company, I'll take care of it for you if you don't consider this stuff to be fun :)

Otherwise my hit to you would be to pay more attention not to the content but to the other aspects of the messages.  This stuff doesn't almost always get sent into our Drop/Delete range because of content.

Matt



Aaron Moreau-Cook wrote:
Thanks for the response. We are already using Sniffer; if a message triggers Sniffer we give the e-mail 60% of our delete weight. This works great, trust me... but I'm sick and tired of seeing w^^o_r-d#s l-!+k^e this in my hold queue.
 
The problem is, how many ways can you spell a word? How many ^,*,$,#, and other characters can you put into a word to slip by Sniffer? Apparently there are 360,000 to spell Viagra by inserting these characters (and others) and changing certain letters to numbers.
 
I'm frustrated by spammers, I know we all are so I'm just trying to find out if this is *even* a viable way to help declude stop spam.
 
Thanks
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter File - Maximum Size?

There are 600,426,974,379,824,381,952 ways to spell viagra.  How many bad words do you wish to target?

    http://tinyurl.com/2dgoq

BTW, it appears that some of the spammers have gone legit to advertise on this page.

RegEx is the only way to tag that stuff, and Declude has no native RegEx capabilities.  This wouldn't be a set it and forget it type of config either as there would be exceptions and other things that would need monitoring, and of course where would you stop?

It's not worth the effort to go tagging so many words or phrases like this, spammers are generally sophisticated enough to still get stuff through.  I recommend that you just pay Sniffer a little money and use this in combination with Declude to enhance your block rates if this stuff is still getting through.  Sniffer primarily populates from spamtraps, and this stuff almost always hits spamtraps and therefore most of it will get hit by Sniffer.

On our system, over 90% of the spam that leaks through is from static spammers who don't use any of these methods, primarily because the zombie spammers generally leave many different taggable patterns behind, plus of course Sniffer.

Matt






Aaron Moreau-Cook wrote:
We are currently debating putting a 300,000 line filter file into our production environment. This filter file would have many different variations of certain "bad" words, words we all see everyday in our spam hold files. This test would specifically be a BODY test.
 
Examples would be:
B-L-A-H
B*L*A*H
B^LA-H
B^L~A*H
etc....
 
Our system is a Dual 3.06 GHz server currently running 10% utilization. We process about 50,000 messages a day.
 
Has anyone else put this large of a filter file into place? Any thoughts?
 
Thanks,
 
Aaron
 

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================


Reply via email to