RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response

[Andy Schmidt]

Title: Message

So - they are amateurs <G>.  That doesn't make Challenge/Response bad - it just means that they don't know how to do it right.   I'm not worried about the emails that I "delete" - I've never ever had someone who "wanted" them.   I'm only worried about the "gray" ones which I currently "Bounce" to give legit senders fair warning.  It would be  nice if those "Bounce" messages:   a) were sent from the <> null sender (something that Declude REALLY needs to get a handle on - all they need to do is allows us to specify a different mailer application for it's MSG templates)   b) could contain a "release" URL where a sender could release any false positive.   Of course, if Imail or Declude would run "On Connection" tests, we would need to worry about generating BounceSpam at all.  All that's needed there would a simple TCP/IP proxy for port 25 into which Declude could tie itself.   Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:52 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response Hi Andy,   Well, this one didn't come from a NULL sender... so it looks like B from your keys below falls flat.  I have no idea as to whether EarthLink does A or C. Darin.