(reposting the same message without attachments)

Hi

After reading this thread and have seen 3 spam messages in my inbox who has
final results-lines in the header with more then 200% of my hold weight I've
made some research: Exactly the same is happening here with Declude 3.1.0
and Imail 8.15 from 2006-06-04 20:00:00 GMT+1 on. I have the same actions
for in- and outgoing messages in my config files.

Normaly a message in v3+ is (MID) logged with 6 lines. 
Each message with the final action "NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN" has only 2 lines
in the logfile

06/04/2006 20:00:37.719 q1fa255d9003021bd.smd CBL:10 SPAMCOP:20 ... .  Total
weight = 360.
06/04/2006 20:00:37.719 q1fa255d9003021bd.smd Cumulative action(s) taken on
this email = NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN 

With this final weight the defined action is HOLD.

I've noted also that this two lines are looking nearly like a whitelisted
message:

06/04/2006 19:31:27.015 q18de1b3b00b21c63.smd Action(s) taken for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = WHITELISTED [LAST ACTION=WHITELISTED]
06/04/2006 19:31:27.015 q18de1b3b00b21c63.smd Cumulative action(s) taken on
this email = NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN 

So it seems to me that something is whitelisting this type of message but I
don't know what.

Following my logfiles arround 400 spam each one with a final result between
200 and 400% of the defined hold weight has passed the filter instead of
being HOLD.

Markus




> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von 
> John Shacklett
> Gesendet: Montag, 5. Juni 2006 13:37
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
> 
> This morning I'm seeing a flood of stock spam with scores 
> that are more than double my delete weight getting through 
> with "no action taken". I'm looking at one right now with a 
> score of 67, and in my scheme we delete at 30. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Sunday, 04 June 2006 8:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
> 
> I was noticing the other day on some version of 4.x that 
> bounce messages for a domain that should have been using the 
> settings in my $Default$.JunkMail failed to take those 
> actions.  Typically I do per-domain configs, but a few I just 
> have using my $Default$.JunkMail. I noticed this as soon as I 
> upgraded to 4.x, and I'm pretty sure it is a bug.  I am not 
> sure if it only affects bounce messages or all messages for 
> those domains (note that all of my domains are gatewayed from 
> the Declude box so they may be treated differently from 
> locally hosted E-mail.
> 
> I believe that putting the actions in your Global.cfg would 
> take action on this stuff.  Global.cfg is meant for outgoing 
> E-mail actions.  While this was clearly incoming E-mail and 
> not the way things used to work with 2.x and before, I'm 
> pretty sure that this will take care of the issue.
> 
> When I get some time to look into this further I'll probably 
> report the bug to Declude.  I'm pretty sure that I have seen 
> several other such posts that might have been caused by this 
> change in behavior.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> Heimir Eidskrem wrote:
> 
> >
> > Why would no action been taken on this email.
> > We hold on 100.
> >
> >
> > From Declude log:
> >
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:44.987 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Triggered COUNTRIES 
> > CONTAINS filter COUNTRYFILTER on ES [weight->10].
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.003 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Filter: Set 
> max weight 
> > to 60.
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.112 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Filter: Set 
> max weight 
> > to 70.
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.159 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Filter 
> REVDNSBLACKLIST: 
> > Skipping E-mail with a current weight of 245 (>=80)
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.159 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Filter BADWORDFILTER: 
> > Skipping E-mail with a current weight of 245 (>=30)
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.159 q60eb01820000d92b.smd SPAMCOP:70 
> FIVETENSRC:30
> > SORBS-DUL:35 COUNTRYFILTER:10 SNIFFERGETRICH:100 .  Total 
> weight = 245.
> > 06/04/2006 17:38:45.159 q60eb01820000d92b.smd Cumulative action(s) 
> > taken on this email = NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN
> >
> >
> >
> > Received: from jose-mih7wjftkx [62.42.134.246] by xxxxxxxxxxx with 
> > ESMTP
> >  (SMTPD-8.22) id A0EC1404; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 17:38:36 -0500
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 22:38:39 -0060
> > From: "Rene Benjamin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Mailer: The Bat! (3.69.9) Personal
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Under The Radar Equity Alert
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Declude-Sender: <> [62.42.134.246]
> > X-Declude-Spoolname: D60eb01820000d92b.smd
> > X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP, FIVETENSRC, SORBS-DUL, 
> NOLEGITCONTENT, 
> > IPNOTINMX, COUNTRYFILTER, SNIFFERGETRICH, WEIGHT75, WEIGHT100, 
> > CATCHALLMAILS [245]
> > X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail 
> (www.declude.com) 
> > for spam.
> > X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status: U
> > X-UIDL: 440029386
> >
> >
> > X-IMail-ThreadID: 60eb01820000d92b
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
> > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be 
> found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be 
> found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to