John, I'm still using the default Hijack hold levels, they seem OK for our case. Since I started using it (5 days ago) I've seen 3-5 hold cases, usually from users sending chain letters, missioner's pray letters, e-mails to group of friends, relatives, etc. I'm whitelisting those that have a real need to send larger volumes of e-mails. If you have any tips to improve this please let me know.
In any case I strongly think that Declude Virus should handle the message before Hijack to avoid holding any messages with viruses or banned extensions. Don't you agree? Adolfo Justiniano Santa Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Is Declude Hijack run before Declude Virus First, I hope you are dealing with what ever situation that put the messages into the hold folders in the first place. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by the Santa Cruz BBS anti-virus system] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
