> I'm still using the default Hijack hold levels, they seem OK for our > case. Since I started using it (5 days ago) I've seen 3-5 hold cases, > usually from users sending chain letters, missioner's pray letters, > e-mails to group of friends, relatives, etc. I'm whitelisting those that > have a real need to send larger volumes of e-mails. If you have any tips > to improve this please let me know.
I would think long and hard before starting to whitelist IPs. It would be advisable to sit down with the powers to be and come up with an enforceable policy, then adjust the configuration for that policy. Example, the company I used to work for once had a temp employee (for the summer) that was involved in missionary work. He started sending out e-mails related to that and tripped HOLD2. I adamantly told him he can not do that, and that we can sit down with the boss to figure out what he needs to do, if it is allowable using company resources, and is there a way it can be done legitimately. We ended up setting up a list service for him to use. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
