Playing devils advocate for a minute.... Clearly breaking apps is a different story, but isn't evolving your business model to take on your competitors just good business sense?
I would argue that some of the stuff they are doing in the .NET space is innovative, whereas others is taking someone else's idea and making it better. Isn't that just the way the world works? Ferrari(or Porsche if you prefer) didn't invent the car they just build on Benz's ideas and made them better. Do you feel the same about them? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neven MacEwan Sent: Friday, 28 April 2006 12:08 p.m. To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List Subject: Re: [DUG] More Delphi news... J Im not quite sure how numbers could be 'anti .NET' but i'm not surprised by the numbers 0.1% would have been to much. Does anyone remember OS/2 and how one of the office apps used to fall over in it Its quite obvious how M$ work, muddy, divide, conquer, The examples of this are endless and .NET is just one to slow Java, if XUL takes off, we bring in XAML, If Ajax gets a foothold ... Freedom to innovate..bullshit N Jeremy North wrote: > On 4/28/06, Richard Vowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What a very interesting post. Thanks KuetFung! > > Take Grimes' posts with a grain of salt. He is very anti-.NET. > > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > Delphi mailing list > [email protected] > http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > > -- Neven MacEwan (B.E. E&E) Ph. 09 620 1356 Mob. 027 4749 062 New Address Details =================== MWK Computer Systems 1 Taumata Rd Sandringham Auckland Ph 620 1356 Fx 620 1336 _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
