hi @ all,

if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before we
continue with it or we start a vote about it.

regards,
gerhard



2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>

> Yes, fully agree.
> I don't see any good reason to create a new framework.
>
> Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great.
> They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan to do so.
>
> There is some interesting posts.
>
> http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html
>
> http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]>
>
> > >Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro),  Deltaspike
> should
> > >enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That includes a
> DS
> > >integration from Shiro.
> > +1
> >
> > >Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different existing security
> > >frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS modules
> (LDAP,
> > >JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of CDI, that
> > should
> > >be fine
> > +1
> >
> > With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone interested in
> > any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and that sounds
> > very nice and elegant.
> > --
> > Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani
> > Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer.
> > http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com
> >
>

Reply via email to