+1 for a vote about the IDM part, but imo we need a clear majority to continue or drop with it. if we don't have a clear majority, we should discuss it again in detail (independent of the result).
regards, gerhard 2012/7/26 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > so it really seems a vote is needed no? > > - Romain > > > 2012/7/26 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > > > I had suggested that awhile ago, but I don't think there was consensus. > Or > > maybe I just thought about it :) been awhile. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:22, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > hmm, not sure it answers the question. Shiro is an (fine IMO) API, DS > > could > > > use it as base instead of creating a new one in the Apache ecosystem. > > > > > > - Romain > > > > > > > > > 2012/7/26 Anil Saldhana <[email protected]> > > > > > >> If Deltaspike desires to provide integration with shiro, make it as an > > >> independent sub module of security. Similar to the independence of the > > IDM > > >> component. Security is too large to reside as a single module. > > >> > > >> On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> - Romain > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> 2012/7/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > >>> > > >>>> hi @ all, > > >>>> > > >>>> if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before we > > >>>> continue with it or we start a vote about it. > > >>>> > > >>>> regards, > > >>>> gerhard > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Yes, fully agree. > > >>>>> I don't see any good reason to create a new framework. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great. > > >>>>> They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan to do > > so. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> There is some interesting posts. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro), > Deltaspike > > >>>>> should > > >>>>>>> enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That > > includes > > >> a > > >>>>> DS > > >>>>>>> integration from Shiro. > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different existing > > >>>> security > > >>>>>>> frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS > modules > > >>>>> (LDAP, > > >>>>>>> JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of CDI, > > that > > >>>>>> should > > >>>>>>> be fine > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone > > interested > > >>>> in > > >>>>>> any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and that > > >> sounds > > >>>>>> very nice and elegant. > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani > > >>>>>> Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. > > >>>>>> http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >
