I'm actually questioning myself why we have the 'modules' folder at all. Do we like to have anything else apart from it?
If not, then we move the modules in parallel to core ... LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Anil Saldhana <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 5:01 PM > Subject: Re: security: why creating thg from scratch? > > If Deltaspike desires to provide integration with shiro, make it as an > independent sub module of security. Similar to the independence of the IDM > component. Security is too large to reside as a single module. > > On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> - Romain >> >> >> 2012/7/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> >> >>> hi @ all, >>> >>> if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before we >>> continue with it or we start a vote about it. >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Yes, fully agree. >>>> I don't see any good reason to create a new framework. >>>> >>>> Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great. >>>> They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan to do > so. >>>> >>>> There is some interesting posts. >>>> >>>> >>> > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html >>>> >>>> >>> > http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html >>>> >>>> Jean-Louis >>>> >>>> >>>> 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>>> Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro), > Deltaspike >>>> should >>>>>> enable all security frameworks to provide integration. That > includes a >>>> DS >>>>>> integration from Shiro. >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>>> Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different > existing >>> security >>>>>> frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps JAAS > modules >>>> (LDAP, >>>>>> JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...) top of > CDI, that >>>>> should >>>>>> be fine >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone > interested >>> in >>>>> any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS and > that sounds >>>>> very nice and elegant. >>>>> -- >>>>> Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani >>>>> Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. >>>>> http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com >>>>> >>>> >>> >
