On 02.03.2014 08:39, David Eccles (gringer) wrote: > I will try that, thanks. I'm not used to 250bp data, and forgot that this was > a bacteria, so expected memory consumption to skyrocket when > doing a de-bruijn assembly with that high kmer value. It doesn't seem so bad > so far (~16GB or so after the read phase vs ~6GB with kmer=31).
FWIW, even with k=125, I get the high half-peak for low coverage (possibly due to systematic errors with the prior BayesHammer error correction). However after applying the patch the coverage analysis now ignores this.... - D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Denovoassembler-users mailing list Denovoassembler-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/denovoassembler-users
