Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Andrew McIntyre wrote: > > >I have updated the version number on the branch to 10.0.2.2 to > >distinguish newer branch builds from the current release. The branch was > >created as of svn revision 110050. > > So since the release was at svn revision 106978 and the branch at > 110050, I think it means the commits listed below are in the 10.0 > branch, but not in the release. Thus they would automatically be > included in any future 10.0 release or snapshot. They all seem to be > within the scope of a bug-fix/stable branch so I say "lazy approval" for > including them in the 10.0 branch. > ...
This may be a dumb question, but why wouldn't the branch have been made at 106979 ? Why have a gap between the release and the branch? -jean
