[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14007311#comment-14007311
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6571:
----------------------------------
A thought about terminology while you review these, Dag -- the functional spec
says "deferred constraints" while the issue title says "deferrable
constraints". Is one more correct than the other? Would it be helpful to change
"deferred" to "deferrable" in the next patch where appropriate?
> Document deferrable constraints
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6571
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6571
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Fix For: 10.11.0.0
>
> Attachments: DERBY-6571-2.diff, DERBY-6571-2.stat, DERBY-6571-2.zip,
> DERBY-6571-3.diff, DERBY-6571-3.stat, DERBY-6571-3.zip, DERBY-6571.diff,
> DERBY-6571.stat, DERBY-6571.zip
>
>
> The contents of functional specification attached to DERBY-532 should be
> included in the documentation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
