On 8/9/06, David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting idea. I feel like I'm really missing something. If no other changes go into the svn copy, why are we making the copy?
What Kristian said. Basically, there needs to be a copy somewhere in svn where we can mark it as beta, since there was an objection to doing it in the trunk. Tags seems like a good place for that, for obvious reasons. On 8/9/06, Kristian Waagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on Andrews suggestion, the copy is "thrown away"/forgotten when the time comes to create the real branch.
After the necessary changes are made so that it reports its version as beta, that copy then lives on as a normal tag, as a record of what went out as the beta, which is useful. So yes, with the approach I was suggesting, the intent would be that once the beta is distributed, no changes of any kind would happen to the copy in tags. andrew
