[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535953
 ] 

Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-2967:
----------------------------------------

Migrated changes from trunk(revision 585261) into 10.3(revision 586019) 
codeline with following commit comments

Migrating changes (revision 585261) from trunk into 10.3 codeline. I had to 
make some manual changes after merging because CollationTest had few changes in 
main which were not part of 10.3 codeline. The commit comments for the trunk 
codeline checkin were as follows

Commiting the patch (DERBY2967_Oct11_07_diff.txt) attached to DERBY-2967. The 
implementation of LIKE for UCS_BASIC and territory based character string types 
do not differ much(based on SQL standard as explained in comments to this Jira 
entry). I have been able to change the existing code for LIKE (in Like.java) 
for UCS_BASIC character strings to support territory based character strings. 
The existing method in Like.java now gets a new parameter and it is 
RuleBasedCollator. For UCS_BASIC strings, this will be passed as NULL. We check 
if the RuleBasedCollator is NULL and if so then we do simple one character 
equality check for non-metacharacters in pattern and correspnding characters in 
value string. But if RuleBasedCollator is not NULL, then we use it to get 
collation element(s) for one character at a time for non-metacharacters in 
patterns and corresponding characters in value string and do the collation 
element(s) comparison to establish equality. 

In addition to the above mentioned change in Like.java, I have changed the 
callers of the method in Like.java to pass correct value for the 
RuleBasedCollator. 

Additionally, I have added a test to CollationTest.java for the code changes. 
Existing like tests in CollationTest2.java were very useful in the testing of 
my changes. And lastly, I changed few of the existing tests to use different 
character string values so that when we run the full collation tests, we do not 
see some of the test failures which are genuine because of the nature of their 
data. 

M    java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/Like.java
M    java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SQLChar.java
M    java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/WorkHorseForCollatorDatatypes.java
M    java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/unitTests/lang/T_Like.java
M    
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/CollationTest.java
M    
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/CollationTest2.java
M    
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/DynamicLikeOptimizationTest.java
M    
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/StreamsTest.java
M    java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/nist/dml068.sql
M    java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/nist/xts729.sql
M    java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/dml068.out
M    java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/xts729.out


> Single character does not match high value unicode character with collation 
> TERRITORY_BASED
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2967
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: DERBY2967_Oct11_07_diff.txt, 
> DERBY2967_Oct11_07_stat.txt, DERBY2967_offset_based_diff_Oct02_07.txt, 
> DERBY2967_offset_based_stat_Oct02_07.txt, fullcoll.out, 
> patch2_setOffset_fullcoll.out, patch2_with_setOffset_diff_Sep2007.txt, 
> patch2_with_setOffset_stat_Sep2007.txt, step1_iteratorbased_Sep1507_diff.txt, 
> step1_iteratorbased_Sep1507_stat.txt, temp_diff.txt, temp_stat.txt, 
> TestFrench.java, TestNorway.java
>
>
> With TERRITORY_BASED collation '_' does not match  the character \uFA2D.  It 
> is the same for english or norwegian. FOR collation UCS_BASIC it matches 
> fine.  Could you tell me if this is a bug?
> Here is a program to reproduce.
> import java.sql.*;
> public class HighCharacter {
>    public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception
>    {
>    System.out.println("\n Territory no_NO");
>    Class.forName("org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver");
>    Connection conn = 
> DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:derby:nordb;create=true;territory=no_NO;collation=TERRITORY_BASED");
>    testLikeWithHighestValidCharacter(conn);
>    conn.close();
>    System.out.println("\n Territory en_US");
>    conn = 
> DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:derby:endb;create=true;territory=en_US;collation=TERRITORY_BASED");
>    testLikeWithHighestValidCharacter(conn);
>    conn.close();
>    System.out.println("\n Collation USC_BASIC");
>    conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:derby:basicdb;create=true");
>    testLikeWithHighestValidCharacter(conn);
>    }
> public static  void testLikeWithHighestValidCharacter(Connection conn) throws 
> SQLException {
>    Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
>    try {
>    stmt.executeUpdate("drop table t1");
>    }catch (SQLException se)
>    {// drop failure ok.
>    }
>    stmt.executeUpdate("create table t1(c11 int)");
>    stmt.executeUpdate("insert into t1 values 1");
>  
>    // \uFA2D - the highest valid character according to
>    // Character.isDefined() of JDK 1.4;
>    PreparedStatement ps =
>    conn.prepareStatement("select 1 from t1 where '\uFA2D' like ?");
>      String[] match = { "%", "_", "\uFA2D" };
>    for (int i = 0; i < match.length; i++) {
>    System.out.println("select 1 from t1 where '\\uFA2D' like " + match[i]);
>    ps.setString(1, match[i]);
>    ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
>    if( rs.next() && rs.getString(1).equals("1"))
>        System.out.println("PASS");
>    else          System.out.println("FAIL: no match");
>    rs.close();
>    }
>   }
> }
> Mamta made some comments on this issue in the following thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Single-character-does-not-match-high-value-unicode-character-with-collation-TERRITORY_BASED.-Is-this-a-bug-tf4118767.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to