Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rick Hillegas wrote: >> >> Here's what the community approved: >> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---Approve-coding-conventions-for-the-Derby-project-td5771191.html >> >> >> >> We are supposed to use spaces rather than tabs and indentation >> should be 4 spaces according to the included standard >> (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html). However, >> we also allowed ourselves plenty of wiggle room in old code. > Well there were quite a few rumblings during the vote so I am not > totally sure it passed or at least that consensus was reached.
Do rumblings nullify the results of a vote? According to the voting guidelines [1], votes on procedural issues have passed if there are more favourable votes than unfavourable ones, which I think was the case in that vote. Also, no one can veto a vote on a procedural issue. [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -- Knut Anders
