On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:17 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Hi Marc, * > > Marc Paré schrieb: > > Hi Bernhard > > > > [...] > > > > So, should we then advise the different language marketing groups to > > make use of the Mplus fonts for their design and content until the Vegur > > font work is completed? Why should we just not adopt and improve on the > > Mplus font set instead of Vegur? Is there a technical reason why we are > > so set on Vegur? > > No - not technical. It's just visual / consistency.
And the two fonts mix fairly well. Here is the updated file http://lo-portal.us/temp/na-dvd-case-es-04-11-24c.png All the text has been changed to M+ 1p, with the exception of the word LibreOffice on the spine which was left as Vegur. Needed to set the font size a tad smaller for all the other text as the metrics was a bit different. Also, regenerated the PDF and SVG logo to be 120 px high vs 128 just to give a little more emphasis to the ODF logo, and flooded the tab on the PDF logo with the same red as used on the 'whatever that little diddy is in the body of it..a whip?'..*smile*. (Yes I can do that, this graphic is Public Domain from OpenClipart.org) It looks fairly good. //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
