On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:17 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > 2011/4/25 drew <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:17 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > >> Hi Marc, * > >> > >> Marc Paré schrieb: > >> > Hi Bernhard > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > So, should we then advise the different language marketing groups to > >> > make use of the Mplus fonts for their design and content until the Vegur > >> > font work is completed? Why should we just not adopt and improve on the > >> > Mplus font set instead of Vegur? Is there a technical reason why we are > >> > so set on Vegur? > >> > >> No - not technical. It's just visual / consistency. > > > > And the two fonts mix fairly well. > > > > Here is the updated file > > http://lo-portal.us/temp/na-dvd-case-es-04-11-24c.png > > > > All the text has been changed to M+ 1p, with the exception of the word > > LibreOffice on the spine which was left as Vegur. > > Good idea! > > > Needed to set the font size a tad smaller for all the other text as the > > metrics was a bit different. > > > > Also, regenerated the PDF and SVG logo to be 120 px high vs 128 just to > > give a little more emphasis to the ODF logo, and flooded the tab on the > > PDF logo with the same red as used on the 'whatever that little diddy is > > in the body of it..a whip?'..*smile*. (Yes I can do that, this graphic > > is Public Domain from OpenClipart.org) > > > > It looks fairly good. > > > > Indeed! I'll do a first review for the later today. > Thanks again, Drew!
Great, the GIMP xcf file is sitting in the same location - feel free to grab it if you like - I won't touch it then, till I hear from you. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
