2011/4/25 drew <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:17 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote: >> Hi Marc, * >> >> Marc Paré schrieb: >> > Hi Bernhard >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > So, should we then advise the different language marketing groups to >> > make use of the Mplus fonts for their design and content until the Vegur >> > font work is completed? Why should we just not adopt and improve on the >> > Mplus font set instead of Vegur? Is there a technical reason why we are >> > so set on Vegur? >> >> No - not technical. It's just visual / consistency. > > And the two fonts mix fairly well. > > Here is the updated file > http://lo-portal.us/temp/na-dvd-case-es-04-11-24c.png > > All the text has been changed to M+ 1p, with the exception of the word > LibreOffice on the spine which was left as Vegur.
Good idea! > Needed to set the font size a tad smaller for all the other text as the > metrics was a bit different. > > Also, regenerated the PDF and SVG logo to be 120 px high vs 128 just to > give a little more emphasis to the ODF logo, and flooded the tab on the > PDF logo with the same red as used on the 'whatever that little diddy is > in the body of it..a whip?'..*smile*. (Yes I can do that, this graphic > is Public Domain from OpenClipart.org) > > It looks fairly good. > Indeed! I'll do a first review for the later today. Thanks again, Drew! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
