Hi Laurent,

[ top posting by design ]
And then what is the piece you bring to the impress mode toolbar analysis?
Kind regards
Sophie
Le 22 janv. 2016 20:00, "Laurent Lyaudet" <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I don't buy the argument "Go to the design hangouts if you have something
> to say or else shut up".
> This sounds like TyrannyOffice more than LibreOffice.
> No schedule for a world project can make it possible that all the people
> that want to participate can effectively participate in the design hangouts.
> Design mailing list is Libre, the design hangouts give all the powers to a
> smaller set of persons.
> It doesn't matter that they are benevolent and have a lot of good will.
> They must accept feedback from the mailing list and from users.
>
> I agree that complaints from users should be polite but we must accept the
> verdict when we fail to do something good.
> Nobody is perfect.
> I also know that feedback is unfair since people are much more motivated
> to give their feedback when they are unhappy.
> That's how the world works most of the time.
> Detaching yourself of the imperfections of the world is part of becoming
> adult
> (maybe "detaching yourself" is too strong, I tried to translate "prendre
> du recul".
>  It applies both to the people that gives the feedback and the people that
> recieves the feedback).
>
> Best regards,
>   Laurent
>
>
> Le 22/01/2016 15:38, Pedro Rosmaninho a écrit :
>
>> I recall seeing those discussions in the design Hangouts minutes. I
>> haven't
>> participated in them.
>>
>> <<Another example, I just read in the last design minute [1] that a
>> discussion was started about migrating search&replace in sidebar, and more
>> important, thinking about modifying the behavior of sidebar !
>>
>> AFAIK, there was no announcement, we have no idea of any schedule (time to
>> discuss, time to make proposals, time to evaluate them, expected time of
>> coding...)
>> How can people participate without a minimum of schedule ?>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll let in on a little known thing: the *Hangouts have a defined
>> schedule*!!!!
>> And actually here's the thing:
>>
>>     1. people make proposals in the Hangout meetings,
>>     2. people discuss proposals in the Hangout meetings
>>     3. They evaluate proposals in the Hangout meetings!!!.
>>
>> It's not like people are meeting in a dark basement plotting on ways to do
>> UI work without informing the users.* If you want to make proposals,
>> discuss proposal, evaluate them and participate in the development then
>> SHOW UP IN THE DESIGN HANGOUTS MEETINGS!!!* I accompany this mailing list
>> for years and since UI development picked up pace in the last year and a
>> half the devs were tireless in trying to atract new people.
>>
>> As for that Sidebar proposal they started discussing that in that Hangout
>> meeting and it will evolve along time. The discussion about what to do
>> with
>> the Sidebar has been ongoing since it was introduced in LO. If you don't
>> know that what the hell do you want?
>> To fill the design process with so much red tape and impediments that the
>> UI is basically frozen for all eternity just because you didn't like one
>> change that was done?
>> About a feature that is going to be re-evaluated because some lazy people
>> decided to shout loud about it after the code freeze instead of providing
>> feedback early enough in the multitude of opportunities they had???
>>
>> As for the rudeness of the feedback of real world users. If they passed
>> that feedback to you like why didn't you or Italo *simply filtered and
>> presented that feedback in a polite manner*?
>> Do you also feel the need to be rude to people that are working their
>> asses
>> off just because someone vented their frustration to you in a non-polite
>> manner?
>>
>> If you dislike the work done in they UI then show up in the design
>> Hangouts
>> and start proposing differnt things, collaborate with who does the work,
>> try to influence their views positively and maybe submit your code or
>> alternatives. Shouting at them for doing their work is not the way.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Michel RENON <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le 15/01/2016 19:28, Pedro Rosmaninho a écrit :
>>>
>>> Michel, you can't complain that people are using links not posted in a
>>>> tdf/libreoffice website and then talk about feedback in a blog of
>>>> someone else. Why didn't that person provide feedback to the design
>>>> mailing list for example?
>>>>
>>>> It's not the work of the people that work in UI/UX for LibreOffice to
>>>> dig through the Internet looking for feedback in obscure blogs.
>>>>
>>>> But that's currently the state of design documents : they are all stored
>>> in personal gdocs, gdrive, blogs...
>>>
>>> That's why I asked to upload all design documents in the official tdf
>>> wiki
>>> : it's the central and official place to find anything related to
>>> LibreOffice. And it oblige the uploader to choose a license.
>>>
>>> It brings 2 other questions about surveys and gdocs :
>>>
>>> - Where are stored the surveys datas ? Who own those datas ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - What are the license of those datas ? of those documents ?
>>>
>>> As it is related to a FOSS project, it is very important to be clear
>>> about
>>> license and ownership of everything used to create LibreOffice.
>>> Developers are very precise about anything related to license, and I
>>> don't
>>> understand why developers working in/with the design team don't ask that
>>> essential question.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As for
>>>
>>>> the tools that they prefer to use, I don't see why they should be forced
>>>> to eat their own dogfood.
>>>> Should they try to incorporate LO as much as possible in their workflow?
>>>> Obviously! But if it's detrimental to their productivity then it's
>>>> better not to untill it suits them (they then can file bugs and offer
>>>> feedback on waht needs to be changed).
>>>> No company in the world does that if there's better alternatives out
>>>> there.
>>>> Heck, do you think development of software in Google is done in ChromeOS
>>>> or Android? Or that they don't use Windows/MacOS/Linux distros?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please, don't suppose I'm so dumb...
>>> I write software for 25 years
>>>
>>>
>>> "eat their own dogfood" has 3 points :
>>>
>>> - marketing : enhance confidence in the product
>>> tell people outside the FOSS circle that LibreOffice is really usable and
>>> versatile
>>>
>>> - ethical : TDF fights for open formats, open source software, it is
>>> logical to use tools that respect those values
>>>
>>> - technical : if we are our first users, we'll be the first to ask for
>>> corrections/enhancements. The more we are uncompromising, the better
>>> LibreOffice will be.
>>>
>>>
>>> People in charge of the UI/UX take into account as much feedback as they
>>>
>>>> can and that is quite transparent. Just go check the Hangouts minutes.
>>>> If lately the UI/UX hasn't been stable maybe it's because it had been
>>>> "stable" (more like fossilized) for far too long. There were even loads
>>>> of features that weren't exposed in the UI! I think it's more than
>>>> certain that as the UI/UX becomes updated that it will be more stated.
>>>> But in a piece of software with scheduled releases instead of a "launch
>>>> when it's ready" model people will inevitably see changes across the
>>>> different releases. As they do for the features that are introduced in
>>>> each version.
>>>>
>>>> As for Italo complaints, I find them very unfair since he was really
>>>> aggressive and even issued threats when he just complained in a really
>>>> late stage of the development process for 5.1.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it was a bit aggressive, but that's the feedback of real users in
>>> real-world usage...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Where was his feedback
>>>
>>>> when this was discussed? Why didn't he provide his feedback earlier?
>>>>
>>>> very good question !
>>>
>>> Can you send links of design minutes where that subject was announced and
>>> discussed ?
>>> I searched in my thunderbird and found nothing
>>> (it may be a search error in my thunderbird)
>>>
>>>
>>> Another example, I just read in the last design minute [1] that a
>>> discussion was started about migrating search&replace in sidebar, and
>>> more
>>> important, thinking about modifying the behavior of sidebar !
>>>
>>> AFAIK, there was no announcement, we have no idea of any schedule (time
>>> to
>>> discuss, time to make proposals, time to evaluate them, expected time of
>>> coding...)
>>> How can people participate without a minimum of schedule ?
>>>
>>>
>>>   If
>>>
>>>> he wants to have a bigger participation in the development then maybe he
>>>> should participate in the process earlier and not start shouting when
>>>> there's already a hard freeze when he could've said something before.
>>>>
>>>> I think there's an issue of people not knowing how to properly leave
>>>> their feedback.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> yes, the most important way to give feedback is to participate in
>>> hangouts.
>>>
>>> As most of us are volunteers, it's not easy to be available at the exact
>>> time and day of the corresponding subject.
>>>
>>> If design team wants to have more people sending feedback, then it should
>>> announce earlier what it's working on, and then send some kind of RFC
>>> (request for comment) on different mailing lists (why not social networks
>>> to have a broader audience ?)
>>>
>>>
>>> And as I've already said, design process should be done *very early*, and
>>> it should be completed *before* coding starts !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Michel
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg07585.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>>> Problems?
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>>> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
>>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>>> deleted
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
>

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to