On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree wholeheartedly with your email. But I wonder if this part is a > bit looking at the past through rose coloured glasses. Vector roll out > was certainly better than some other feature rollouts, but... it was > hardly without pain if I remember correctly. Although it was a long > time ago, and before I was involved on the dev side, so my memory is a > bit fuzzy. > > I was also a bit surprised to hear that process held up as a positive example. But it was before my time as well, so I don't have direct knowledge, just what Liam related to me.
The parts of that process I'm most excited about are: 1. setting public success criteria ahead of time, based on user adoption/retention 2. the public commitment to iterate*, before broad rollout, based on specific feedback from beta testers. - J *and not just fix bugs, but actually revise/add/eliminate features -- Jonathan T. Morgan Senior Design Researcher Wikimedia Foundation User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
