On 12/6/06, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Wouldn't this just be a differently labeled link to get the .ics that we're
supplying for iCal?  If so, then I say put it in.

no, because the thing on the server that handles an icalendar export
like this is in the ui section of the server, and the webcal url
handler is not (it will be its own little servlet). those front ends
will in fact call the same service method to generate the icalendar
object.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to