Forwarding to Design as per Reid's suggestion.

Andi and I settled this outside and he retracts his 'Yuck, sounds as bad as "No items in this silo" statement. There was a misunderstand about the subtle, yet significant differences between an application area and a silo. (Silos partition / segregate / erect insurmountable walls that simultaneously imprison and exclude. Application areas filter / narrow focus / form flexible, porous, membranous, conceptual boundaries that are easily crossed, stretched and expanded.) Be a Uniter, not a Divider!

In any case, here are what I believe are the high-level design requirements:

Avoid terminology related to:
+ Views
+ Search and filters (I don't think users necessarily understand what's going in the sidebar through the lens of search and queries.)
+ Display issues

I would prefer to stick to concrete ideas that are within the realm of end-user vocabulary
+ Items
+ Collections
+ Application areas

(List is not in the end user vocabulary.)

Mimi



Begin forwarded message:

From: Reid Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: April 2, 2007 11:33:04 AM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [chandler-users] This collection is empty.

On Apr 2, 2007, at 14:19, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Mimi Yin wrote:
Well we now use view to refer to the display widget in the Summary pane: Triage Table versus Calendar, so that doesn't feel quite right either.

I mean the literal way to do it would be: "This collection contains no items in this application area."

But for some reason, that sounds to me like someone trying to avoid a touchy subject.

What about: "No items in this application area."

Yuck, sounds as bad as "No items in this silo"

Andi..

How about:
        No applicable items
        No items found (implies filtering/search)
        Empty filter (-1 on explicit use of word "filter" :-/)
Empty list (more subtle implication of processing/filtering; but introduces term "list"..)

Hm, this is sounding more like a design list issue..

Reid

_______________________________________________
chandler-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users
Begin forwarded message:

From: D John Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: April 2, 2007 11:31:35 AM PDT
To: Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andi Vajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, chandler- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [chandler-users] This collection is empty.

How about "No items to view"?

On Apr 2, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:

Well we now use view to refer to the display widget in the Summary pane: Triage Table versus Calendar, so that doesn't feel quite right either.

I mean the literal way to do it would be: "This collection contains no items in this application area."

But for some reason, that sounds to me like someone trying to avoid a touchy subject.

What about: "No items in this application area."

This is equally as untrue as This collection is empty, but perhaps people will be less likely to conclude that they have no Msgs/ Tasks or Events at all and "This collection'" will be more readily implied.

Mimi

On Apr 2, 2007, at 10:44 AM, D John Anderson wrote:

Personally, I think that "0 items" doesn't really address the "heart-attack" response of "no items in the collection", and the benefit of being shorter doesn't seem very important.

How about "no items in this view"?

John


On Apr 2, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:


On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Mimi Yin wrote:

I have logged a new bug to improve the text, so that it's less heart-attack inducing :o)

https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8627

New Proposal: 0 items.

How about: "No items displayed" ?

Andi..
_______________________________________________
chandler-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users



Begin forwarded message:

From: Andi Vajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: April 2, 2007 11:19:49 AM PDT
To: Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: D John Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, chandler- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [chandler-users] This collection is empty.
Reply-To: Andi Vajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Mimi Yin wrote:

Well we now use view to refer to the display widget in the Summary pane: Triage Table versus Calendar, so that doesn't feel quite right either.

I mean the literal way to do it would be: "This collection contains no items in this application area."

But for some reason, that sounds to me like someone trying to avoid a touchy subject.

What about: "No items in this application area."

Yuck, sounds as bad as "No items in this silo"

Andi..

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to