Ah, ic. That certainly makes sense.
I think we could solve Pieter's problem if we sub-sorted items in the
order that they 'would have' been triaged by users.
So basically events and items with alarms would appear in the DONE
section with the most recent stuff at the top and the oldest stuff at
the bottom. In the LATER section, events and items with alarms would
appear with the most imminent stuff at the top and stuff farthest in
the future at the bottom.
Questions
1. How much work would it be to implement this for the import and
subscribe scenarios?
2. Does what we have now inhibit adoption?
I'm not sure what the answer is to question 2. Perhaps I should just
log this bug and we can wait to see if other dogfooders run into the
same problems Pieter ran into?
Mimi
On May 3, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Bryan Stearns wrote:
Assuming you're not sharing triage status, items will be ordered by
the time their triage status was set - so in this case, since
they're autotriaged on arrival, it's the order they arrived.
...Bryan
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
