On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 21:04 +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote: > FUD, FUD, FUD. Do really want to argue on that level? GQ is a GTK+ 2 > application for more than 3 years now.
Argue about what? I haven't used GQ in a long time, I never claimed to be an expert on it. I merely offered my opinion. Just because I don't follow your project doesn't mean I'm trying to spread FUD. As far as the Gtk+ 1.0 stuff. Last time I used GQ that's what it was. When Ross mentioned it was still being maintained I looked the screenshots here: http://gq-project.org/get_information.php That looks like Gtk 1.0 to me. It's not my fault that you don't update your screenshots. That's your responsibility. Shocking as this may seem, the purpose of my original post was to talk about the merits of including LAT into GNOME. Not talk about GQ. I don't have anything against your project. -- Loren Bandiera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MMG Security, Inc. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
