On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:59 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:53:17AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > The main issue that I see with this is that it's much harder to filter > > > away/opt out, so it requires some broader consensus that we want to do > > > this. We can still add a module blacklist if needed, though. > > > > I think build issues should be filed as Bugzilla bugs. At most we maybe > > want to set some keyword / status whiteboard. But I guess the summary > > would be consistent and people will quickly learn of it. > > They should be filed as Bugzilla bugs *after a timeout*. We already see > build failures on ostree popping up on the #testable channel, and those > are usually fixed in a timely manner.
Hmm, makes sense. Maybe start of small? -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list