On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 18:44 +0000, David King wrote: > On 2013-02-13 11:58, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > >When I checked three months ago, 79 of 654 non-archived Git modules had > >no DOAP file at all. 287 out of 575 modules with a DOAP file had an > >entry for "bug-database". GNOME does not even list "bug-database" in > >https://live.gnome.org/action/recall/Git/FAQ?action=recall&rev=29#How_do_I_add_a_description_to_the_git_web_view.3F__What_is_this_.22blah.doap.22.3F > > I just added a "bug-database" item to that DOAP template. > > Should we have a GNOME Goal to tidy up the DOAP files and add a minimum > set of recommended fields? It might not be a great deal of use, so just > some better guidance on the wiki would probably be sufficient.
That sounds like a good plan for 3.9. Comparing GNOME's usage of DOAP files with the DOAP usage in Apache Software Foundation there's a lot more that GNOME can improve though, but it will take me some time to outline it. Which I'll have in March again. Hopefully. If not, ping me. Please. andre -- Andre Klapper | [email protected] http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
