Hello Bastien, Bastien Nocera [2013-02-13 11:23 +0100]: > > I think build issues should be filed as Bugzilla bugs. At most we maybe > > want to set some keyword / status whiteboard. But I guess the summary > > would be consistent and people will quickly learn of it. > > They should be filed as Bugzilla bugs *after a timeout*. We already see > build failures on ostree popping up on the #testable channel, and those > are usually fixed in a timely manner. > > If you file the bugs as soon as they're visible, you'll end up filing > outdated bugs, and severely reducing the good will of the people fixing > those bugs.
Yes, I agree (I just responded with more detail in another response in this thread). Of course the automatically opened bug would be automatically closed again once build and checks work again, but it would still be noise. That said, my gut feeling is that we should start with plain email notifications first, before we dive head-first into auto-filing bugs. They are much less intrusive and can be ignored/filtered away if desired, and don't require a long delay. Thoughts? Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
