On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:59 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > I think build issues should be filed as Bugzilla bugs. At most we maybe > want to set some keyword / status whiteboard. But I guess the summary > would be consistent and people will quickly learn of it.
Don't see a need for keywords here: Could filter by reporter account if a dummy account (e.g. jenkins-buildbot@gnomebugs) was set up that automatically files reports via Bugzilla's XML-RPC interface on build failure (if that's wanted). > You can use information from DOAP files to figure out the Bugzilla > product. This is not always needed. Then commit whatever DOAP fixes are > needed (the DOAP files are not bug free :P. When I checked three months ago, 79 of 654 non-archived Git modules had no DOAP file at all. 287 out of 575 modules with a DOAP file had an entry for "bug-database". GNOME does not even list "bug-database" in https://live.gnome.org/action/recall/Git/FAQ?action=recall&rev=29#How_do_I_add_a_description_to_the_git_web_view.3F__What_is_this_.22blah.doap.22.3F andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list