Hi Andy, On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 12:50 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > what would this mean for systems not using systemd?
It wasn't hard to keep compatibility with the old way while working on the patches. Particularly since it requires not just a dependency on systemd, but bleeding edge systemd, with architectural issues still left to work out. I think the most important thing is to get applications in their own cgroups; redoing the internals of gnome-session is less useful for the near future. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
