hi; On 24 September 2013 08:03, Andrew W. Nosenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Andy Tai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> what would this mean for systems not using systemd? >> >> >> Systems not using systemd already fall back to ConsoleKit, which does not >> have any maintainer. We don't support features like suspend or hibernate on >> ConsoleKit anymore and it's pretty much on life support only at this point. >> >> For 3.12, we will keep the old gnome-session and gdm code that uses >> ConsoleKit and fork/exec ourselves in the case where you compile without >> logind support, but I wouldn't expect it to be around much longer. >> >> Do you have any specific examples of systems not using systemd that you >> would like to run GNOME on? >> > > Did you heard about FreeBSD?
nothing has really changed in that respect. FreeBSD developers and users should follow the great example of Antoine, who has been hard at work to ensure that GNOME builds and works on OpenBSD. it's an undeniable reality that most of the developers in GNOME use Linux, which means things get developed, tested, fixed, and designed on Linux first. the only way to counter eventual breakage on other systems is to work upstream. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
