On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Andy Tai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> what would this mean for systems not using systemd?
> >
> >
> > Systems not using systemd already fall back to ConsoleKit, which does not
> > have any maintainer. We don't support features like suspend or hibernate
> on
> > ConsoleKit anymore and it's pretty much on life support only at this
> point.
> >
> > For 3.12, we will keep the old gnome-session and gdm code that uses
> > ConsoleKit and fork/exec ourselves in the case where you compile without
> > logind support, but I wouldn't expect it to be around much longer.
> >
> > Do you have any specific examples of systems not using systemd that you
> > would like to run GNOME on?
> >
>
> Did you heard about FreeBSD?
>
> PS. Do you know any OS that _uses_ systemd at all beside Linux?
>

The situation is the same as always: if somebody wants to maintain the
services to run on FreeBSD, you're very welcome to do that. But unless
somebody does the work, the existing code will probably get rusty and
broken.

--
> Andrew W. Nosenko <[email protected]>
>



-- 
  Jasper
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to