Thank you Paul for running with this.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. The
> source code is at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/
>

Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about this is
is merely an observation.

**my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment


>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Process
>

We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise you
here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. We
can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker.


>
> The release was made from (commit
> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git
>

I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag within
git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release!
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags
Is this required?
I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to
should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable'
release in the future.
If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience.

OK lets move on,

CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1]

[0] http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&version=12325041

lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls
KEYS-0.4            climate-0.4-rc1.zip        climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc
    climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5        climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1

lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4
gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) <
[email protected]>" imported
gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
[email protected]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 2
gpg:               imported: 2  (RSA: 2)

lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify
climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 2C47D568
gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
[email protected]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990  4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 D568

lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip
MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1

ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great.

OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory

CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC)
@Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within
NOTICE
This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin
(ycopin on Github). For details please see:
    https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888
    https://github.com/ycopin
    http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/

This makes life and day.

The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not  blocker by any
means.

Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a
blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making
documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1.

I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No
problems it would seem.
I believe we should really address this however within the README.md.


> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is
> open for the next 72 hours.
>
> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> the
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4


I've run DRAT on the release candidate

Reply via email to