Thanks Paul. If you need one of us to roll it while you're on vacation just let us know!
-- Joyce On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Alright looks like I'm on a hold briefly for the next RC as it sounds as > though there will be some work over the weekend. I'll touch base again on > Monday for the next RC. > > --Paul > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 31, 2014, at 6:03 AM, "Michael Joyce" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for checking all this Lewis. I'll be sure to help you get some of > > these issues resolved this weekend/upcoming week (although it looks like > > you made some great headway already with CLIMATE-500). > > > > I think I had a ticket open for resolving some of these license issues as > > well. I'll see if I can find it and link it to the issue. I'll also go > > through and cleanup any of the frontend stuff that is missing headers. I > > know I made that worse when I began the transition over to the "new" > > frontend since I copy/pasted a large amount of files from the old UI and > > haven't updated the others. > > > > > > -- Joyce > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Feel free to use my apachestuff scripts for release verification: > >> > >> https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff/ > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> P.S. Thanks Lewis > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Chief Architect > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> > >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:20 AM > >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release > >> > >>> Thank you Paul for running with this. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release > >>>> Hi Folks, > >>>> > >>>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. > >>>> The > >>>> source code is at: > >>>> > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ > >>> > >>> Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about > this > >>> is > >>> is merely an observation. > >>> > >>> **my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment > >>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Proc > >>>> ess > >>> > >>> We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise > you > >>> here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. > We > >>> can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker. > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> The release was made from (commit > >>>> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at: > >>>> > >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git > >>> > >>> I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag > within > >>> git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release! > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags > >>> Is this required? > >>> I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to > >>> should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable' > >>> release in the future. > >>> If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience. > >>> > >>> OK lets move on, > >>> > >>> CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1] > >>> > >>> [0] > http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt > >>> [1] > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&; > >>> version=12325041 > >>> > >>> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls > >>> KEYS-0.4 climate-0.4-rc1.zip climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > >>> climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1 > >>> > >>> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4 > >>> gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) < > >>> [email protected]>" imported > >>> gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) > < > >>> [email protected]>" imported > >>> gpg: Total number processed: 2 > >>> gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 2) > >>> > >>> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify > >>> climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > >>> gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID > 2C47D568 > >>> gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > >>> [email protected]>" > >>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > >>> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > >>> owner. > >>> Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990 4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 > >>> D568 > >>> > >>> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip > >>> MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1 > >>> > >>> ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great. > >>> > >>> OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory > >>> > >>> CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC) > >>> @Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within > >>> NOTICE > >>> This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin > >>> (ycopin on Github). For details please see: > >>> https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888 > >>> https://github.com/ycopin > >>> http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/ > >>> > >>> This makes life and day. > >>> > >>> The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not blocker by > any > >>> means. > >>> > >>> Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a > >>> blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making > >>> documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1. > >>> > >>> I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No > >>> problems it would seem. > >>> I believe we should really address this however within the README.md. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is > >>>> open for the next 72 hours. > >>>> > >>>> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to > >>>> check > >>>> the > >>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > >>>> passes > >>>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >>>> > >>>> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 > >>> > >>> > >>> I've run DRAT on the release candidate > >> > >> >
