with the following results for DRAT Notes Binaries Archives Standards Apache Generated Unknown 0 0 0 110 23 0 87 I have shipped the results of DRAT to my personal space on minotur and they can be found here folks...
http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/climate/0.4/ There are some ones we need to consider possibly? There are AFAICT 3 +1's... I am certainly not giving any blockers here... however I think we have work to do. @pramirez, as release manager, it's up you you right now. I have not VOTE'd. If you feel based on a review of my comments that it is OK to release then by all means go. I would please arge you to wait and consider some of my points however. Thanks again for puttign OCW 0.4 together. Brilliant. Lewis On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < [email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Paul for running with this. > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release >> Hi Folks, >> >> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. The >> source code is at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ >> > > Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about this > is is merely an observation. > > **my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment > > >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Process >> > > We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise you > here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. We > can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker. > > >> >> The release was made from (commit >> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git >> > > I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag within > git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release! > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags > Is this required? > I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to > should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable' > release in the future. > If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience. > > OK lets move on, > > CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1] > > [0] http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&version=12325041 > > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls > KEYS-0.4 climate-0.4-rc1.zip climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1 > > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4 > gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) < > [email protected]>" imported > gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > [email protected]>" imported > gpg: Total number processed: 2 > gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 2) > > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify > climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 2C47D568 > gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > [email protected]>" > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990 4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 D568 > > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip > MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1 > > ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great. > > OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory > > CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC) > @Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within > NOTICE > This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin > (ycopin on Github). For details please see: > https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888 > https://github.com/ycopin > http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/ > > This makes life and day. > > The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not blocker by any > means. > > Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a > blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making > documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1. > > I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No > problems it would seem. > I believe we should really address this however within the README.md. > > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is >> open for the next 72 hours. >> >> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to >> check the >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes >> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >> >> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 > > > I've run DRAT on the release candidate > > > -- *Lewis*
