I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
suffice.
Thanks gents
Martyn
On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
batch release like last time?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
Martyn,
Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if
possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
release.
John
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
know.
Kind regards
Martyn
[1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
[2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
