i would like to release javamail as an alpha (or beta) version first
because we have not yet executed the TCK and the last changes are big
ones and its maybe to 100% stable (yet)

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>
> I see:
> -> jms 2 api
> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
> -> jta 1.2 api
> -> jaxrs 2 api
> -> ejb 3.2 api
>
>
> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>
> wdyt?
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>:
>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either.  An alpha-1 though would
>> suffice.
>>
>> Thanks gents
>> Martyn
>>
>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>
>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>> batch release like last time?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Martyn,
>>>>
>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer
>>>> if
>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1].  We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project.  The ActiveMQ6
>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place.  We are hoping to
>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>
>>



-- 
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Reply via email to